Entries in 2009 (48)

Tuesday
23Feb2010

A Perfect Getaway

Release Year: 2009

Director: David Twohy

Review: An odd, twisted, adventure of a couple trying to escape another, murderous, couple on their honeymoon in Hawaii.  There is a lot wrong with this movie.  The main character is a screenwriter and its obvious the screenwriter had a good time talking about the process in the movie and at the same time trying to out clever the audience.  It's a complete mess.  There are plot holes a mile wide, twists that you can see coming and corny plot points which make it apparent exactly the caliber of film you are dealing with.  And yet, despite all of this, I couldn't help but have fun with it.  Yes, its flawed in every imaginable way, but I still had a good time on the ride.  I found myself enjoying the pace, trying to keep up with the writer, and anticipating his next twist.  I enjoyed the ridiculous situations and the stereotyped characters, it was oddly comforting.   Upon the conclusion of the movie I declared it was 'terrible', and it was, but I still got some guilty enjoyment out of it.  There is nothing new here, and its certainly not high class cinema, but its not the worst thing you could watch on a plane ride.
Rating: 3/5

Sunday
21Feb2010

Adam

Release Year: 2009

Director: Max Mayer

Review: The premise had be intrigued, a man with Asperger syndrome gets involved with a normal woman, and they struggle as a couple.  The problem is movie fails to set up a believable relationship.  On the one hand you have Beth (Rose Byrne) an impossibly attractive, charismatic and seemingly flawless women and Adam (Hugh Dancy), a shuttered, introverted, emotionally closed and at times angry man with Aspergers.  Through random chance they meet and become a couple, and yet it is never shown what is appealing in Adam to Beth.  There is zero believability in the relationship, something the entire film is pivoted on.  There are some touching moments, and it does bring up good questions on the extents of love, and what we are willing to overcome in a relationship, but on a whole it fails.  Its overly convenient and never captures the essence of the relationship, a misstep which cannot be overlooked.
Rating: 3/5



Sunday
24Jan2010

Crazy Heart

Release Year: 2009

Director: Scott Cooper

Review: So we have Jeff Bridges starring in a 'The Wrestler'esque story of personal redemption.  I'm in.  The tale of Bad Blake, a former country music star who is reduced to playing bowling alleys and who spends more hours drunk than sober.  He lives the life he chose to live, and it will kill him if he keeps it up.  This is a story about self worth, and examining what is important in life.  Its certainly not the first story of its kind, but it works in its own way.  It is true to its name, it has heart.  It hooks you in and invests you in Bad's fortune.

Lets not mince words, this movie is Jeff Bridges' showcase.  He is a talented actor and is given a fantastic character to portray.  The movie is made or broken on his performance and he comes through in a big way.  Authenticity should be defined by his performance.  Not only is he a talented actor, but he is a talented musician, and that comes through.  The haggard, but ever enduring 'Bad' is personified by Bridges.  The man appears to have one foot in the grave, and yet, when it counts, always manages to come through.  He may not be accountable, but he is always reliable to show up eventually.  This film is all about Bridges, and all about the music.  Both are fantastic.  I'm no country music fan, but seeing the passion, pain and heartache in the way Bridges performs the songs shines through any musical bias.  Bridges goes beyond believable and becomes indistinguishable from his character and the performance alone is worth the price of admission. 

Beyond Bridges, the movie does stand up fairly well on its own.  Its a pretty straight forward plot.  It's more of a character study then a gripping story.  Maggie Gyllenhaal plays a fine love interest to the seemingly untamable Bad.  It's a good performance that is dwarfed by a much greater role.  The main problem with the film is that it is a bit predictable and plain.  This isn't the first movie of its type.  Its pretty well established the road in which it will take, and it never really veers from it.  At a certain point it becomes a bit redundant, and it almost seems like its just going through the motions, trying to put in a few more scenes for Bridges to chew on.  There is a great deal of hope for Bad, but some of the effectiveness is lost by dragging it out and being so dead on.

While decent on its own, the reason to see this film is for Jeff Bridges.  He is given a very stereotyped character and manages to make him interesting putting his own touches in.  It is a heartwarming movie, and one that is pleasant, if not bordering on great throughout, but runs out of steam towards the end.  It did make me enjoy and appreciate country music, something I wouldn't have thought possible, so it gets points just for that.  It lacks the originality and tight pace that would make it a great film, but I can't argue with a very good film with great performances.

Rating: 4/5

Award Consideration: While I can't rule out a best picture nomination, its a very long shot to win.  Nor does it deserve to.  It's a good movie, but not the best of the year.  Far more movies are more well rounded and bring more to the table.

The obvious award is Jeff Bridges for best actor.  He will be nominated, and will most likely win.  Rourke was robbed last year in a similar role, but Bridges has his past working for him.  He has been a great actor in so many movies, and this appears to be his time.

Finally, the movie brought home a Golden Globe for best song.  I forsee the same honor for the Oscars.  Again, the movie is all about the music, so its fitting it'd win this category.

Friday
22Jan2010

The White Ribbon (Das weisse Band)

Release Year: 2009

Director: Michael Haneke

Review: There is something unnerving about mischievous, evil, children, and yet in Michael Haneke's quiet, methodic, drama they are almost pitied.  In this dour German examination of morality, Hankeke takes a hands off approach to the judgement of the events and doesn't bias the viewer one way or another on how to view the circumstances.  Taking place in a small town directly before the outbreak of World War I, it's not only a a fascinating examination of depths of human depravity, but an ominous peek into the mindset of a country about to plunge deep into its darkest period.

Haneke doesn't soften the bleakness of the story, it would be too kind.  The subject matter is cold, and so is the film.  While beautifully shot, its all in black and white, a constant reminder of the coldness of the people within the small town.  This town, much like in Von Trier's 'Dogville', on the surface looks like a quaint, tight-knit rural community, is actually a hell in of itself.  The similarities to 'Dogville' don't end there, the theme of how low humans can go, even towards one in their own community, is the major point in both.  Also similar is the stark, harsh, visually pallid take each director used.  Von Trier went with a minimal stage set, and Haneke used lack of color, but each managed to stay visually interesting despite their limitations.  Haneke doesn't go quite as far to inflict an uncomfortable viewing experience however.  It was bleak, but not uncomfortably so.  Unfortunately it also was not as interesting.  I often found myself bored, knowing where the film was going and not being challenged.  It was if a niche was found and Haneke never left it.  There is a great deal explored, but in a very Laissez-faire attitude, laid out in a structured manner with subtle undertones which lets the viewer come to their own moral conclusions.

 

 

I didn't enjoy this movie while watching it, and I think that was the point.  Its a type of movie that becomes better the more you reflect on it.  However, it has been a week since I viewed it and I have done plenty of reflecting, and I still can't say I enjoyed it.  I can appreciate what it was trying to do, but I'm not sure of the effectiveness of it. Haneke certainly has a gift for subtlety, but I wish more was done with the themes at hand.  It is certainly a beautiful, and thought provoking film but one that never quite hit home.  There isn't a single scene that sticks out in my mind, none that really connected with me.   It had all the pieces, but falls a bit flat, and while a good film, a disappointment none the less.

Rating: 3/5

Award Consideration: 'The White Ribbon' has already collected its share of awards, winning the Palme d'Or at Cannes, and picking up the best foreign language film at both the BAFTA awards and the Golden Globes.  It is a lock to be nominated, and will all but certainly win for best foreign picture at the Oscars as well.  Without knowing the list of nominees its hard to call whether or not its deserving.  Out of the films nominated at the Golden Globes I had only seen 'Broken Embraces' which similarly was a disappointment to me.  I'm eager to know the nominations, so I can begin my foreign film mini-marathon.  The category is always a favorite of mine.

Wednesday
20Jan2010

An Education

Release Year: 2009

Director: Lone Scherfig

Review: 'An Education' is a smart, brisk and poignant coming of age story.  It is refreshing to see a simple concept executed so well, as so many times the story gets swallowed up by melodrama in similar movies.  Taking place in London in the 1960s, a school girl is faced with the choice of either continuing to pursue her dream of going to Oxford, or abandoning it for a free and fun filled life with an older man.  It wonderfully captures the ignorance of youth without being condescending to its character.

The temptation of living a care free life, full of interesting people and places is too much for Jenny(Carey Mulligan).  She is sucked into a world she is not yet ready for.  Despite her intelligence and perceived maturity, she is still a child.  She is a repressed, studious girl, always looking toward the future, having most fun stifled away so that she is not distracted from her education.  When she is exposed to all the pleasures of life, it is no surprise she is willing to give up everything she once thought was important, to sacrifice her values and morals, all in pursuit of a more interesting life.  This is something that lives in all of us.  A part that is always looking to trade in a perceived boring life for one with adventure.

The acting in this is very good.  Carey Mulligan breaks out in a big way with her performance.  She commands the scenes she is in.  Managing to pull off something which is difficult for a young actress, she seamless transfers between playing a young schoolgirl gossiping with her classmates to holding her own and letting her maturity show when she is conversing with adults.  With her performance it is completely plausible that she is whisked away by an older man.  She conveys a maturity well beyond her years, something which is essential for the premise to work.

'An Education' is pleasant movie. It is solid throughout, with a tight premise and smooth execution.  It is almost too smooth, though.  There are scenes which are overly standard and expected.  This mostly happened while building the relationship between Mulligan and Saarsgaard,  Instead of striving for something new, they played it safe.  Its this which makes me feel like it will not be memorable.  There are few scenes that stand out, and too be a great film there needs to be something that sticks with you long after viewing it.  It is a very good film, that is executed well, but there is nothing that makes it special.  Despite this, what does work is the character evolution and it a very well done coming of age story which raises interesting life questions.
Rating: 3.5/5

Award Consideration: 'An Education' was near the top of a lot of critics year end top 10 lists.  It's a good movie, but not good enough to earn the same praise from me.  It certainly has a shot at making the nomination list for best picture, but little to no chance of winning.

The big buzz coming from 'An Education' is the break out performance of Carey Mulligan.  She makes the movie, and has opened up her career in a big way.  I'm hesitant to believe she could take down bigger stars, but I'm rooting for her.  In any case she will be back in awards talk in years to come.



Saturday
16Jan2010

Fantastic Mr. Fox

Release Year: 2009

Director: Wes Anderson

Review: After seeing the trailer, I was dubious if this style of stop-motion animation could be pulled off without feeling completely out of place.  These fears were completely unfounded.  The style works and is central in making this odd, but thoroughly enjoyable, film work.  Based on the Roald Dahl's book, helmed by Wed Anderson and having a star packed cast, this could have been a huge disappointment.  Fortunately everything melded perfectly together.  Taking a simple, classic, story Anderson pumps it full of a creative energy that makes every second of it feel refreshing.

I thought this was an odd choice for Wes Anderson, but I think it would have floundered under almost anyone else.  Anderson's talent at creating a quirky, but not over the top, atmosphere, allows the emotion and humor to blend while remaining grounded and earnest.  It continues the trend of quality family movies that appeal to everyone, not because they they stuff in adult oriented jokes, but because they don't pander to a young audience.  It is a film which can be enjoyed by any age without losing the emotional edge. There are great character moments, which creates a warmth which abounds.  It is easy to like, and empathize with, the the cast of critters trapped beneath the ground.  Above all else, this is about relationships.  Relationships between husband and wife, father and son, family and community.  This is very much a Thanksgiving movie, even if it is not directly mentioned.  The themes expressed and the mood captured go a long way in making this a holiday classic, and a fine family film in general.
Rating: 4/5

 

Thursday
14Jan2010

2012

Release Year: 2009

Director: Roland Emmerich

Review: A movie that resembles more an amusement park ride then anything resembling a traditional narrative.  Unfortunately I wanted off the ride, far sooner then I should have.  Roland Emmerich loves to destroy things, and this is very much is his ultimate wheelhouse movie.  He is given the entire earth to blowup, only limited by his imagination.  

The problem is the story is absolutely terrible.  There is only so much full throttle destruction one can take before it just becomes noise.  It's also a lazy movie in that there is nothing new here.  Its taken every disaster movie trope and put it in high gear, but rather then make it more interesting it just made it irritating. The movie was all frosting and no cake.  Nearly everything that happens in the film manages to happen in the exact nano-second before complete disaster.  This is fine once or twice, but the entire movie rides that line.  This does not build suspense, it has the opposite effect.  At no time did I feel any peril for the characters, because the film never builds that up.  

For a movie that depends on stakes, there were none in this film.  I didn't care about the fate of this family.  I did not care about much that was happening, I was too busy groaning with the sheer audacity of Emmerich managing to ruin every moment with a predictably cheesy cliche.  The film manages to have the world destroy itself and make me completely apathetic.  Yes, things blow up, but there needs to be more then that for a movie to be enjoyable and this film just doesn't have it.
Rating: 2/5

 

Tuesday
12Jan2010

Broken Embraces

Release Year: 2009

Director: Pedro Almodóvar

Review: There are elements in 'Broken Embraces' which are interesting, but there is a good deal more which doesn't work.  Pedro Almodóvar's newest film is a frustratingly tantalizing, but ultimately flawed melodrama about a former filmmaker dealing with his past life.  The plot is rich enough, and yet the story never grabs hold.

The interesting parts of the film never quite delivered.  You have a film film director, who at the height of his career goes blind. This is something which could be quite profound to explore.  However, we see very little of this pain, this struggle with the loss of such an important sense is largely glossed over.  We see that he hides behind an alter ego. And yet this escapism, which strikes an universal chord, is largely ignored. Its just left to sit there as if it were an afterthought.  Almodovar seems content to just fixate on mundane plot points which only serve to disengage from what does work.

There were an abundance of awkward plot points, which seemed completely unnecessarily.  Rather than furthering the narrative or elevating emotion, they just distract.  Every time there is some momentum built, and I start to get sucked in, I'm pulled out by a needless plot point that didn't fit.  Tying this odd muddled mood together is an atrocious score. I'm not one that normally notices the score, but in this case it stood out, cheapening the entire feel of the movie.  It was a bizarre experience, getting flashes of brilliance and then settling back into a run of the mill spanish soap opera that would have felt at home running in the afternoon on Univision.

It is a shame there is so much that did not work in this film.  There were some moving scenes, helmed by Penelope Cruz, the films saving grace. Her scenes bring to light what this entire movie could have been. While it had all the parts to be a great film, it falters due to flimsy execution.
Rating: 2.5/5

Award Consideration: The main award category for this film will be best supporting actress for Penelope Cruz.  I was thinking it might sneak in with a best foreign language film award, but it appears Spain nominated a different film, so it has no shot.  Can't say I blame them too much.

Cruz has a shot, since she seems to be an Oscar favorite.  I don't think she will end up winning, but it'd be nice to see her on the list since she definitely made this movie what it was.

Tuesday
12Jan2010

The Brothers Bloom

Release Year: 2009

Director: Rian Johnson

Review: A con film with enough quirk and finesse to allow you to forget trying to figure out the con and just enjoy the remarkable ride.  It may have all the standard trappings of a run of the mill con film, but this is so much more.  There is a life to the film, which has you more interested in the characters then the twists.  Anticipating the next double cross keeps you engaged, but its the heart that makes it great.  The cohesive, seamless and eloquent story telling employed by Rian Johnson makes this fun to watch.  I couldn't help but smile as the pieces fell into place.  I wasn't concerned with the end result of the cons, but rather captivated by the process of watching them unwind.  The characters are so well thought out and interesting that its easy to emotionally involve yourself with their plights.  It would have been easy for the film to get frustrating out of control, but because of the strong characters, fine acting and pitch perfect directing, it never seemed to be too much.   As the movie professes, the perfect con is everybody getting what they want, and so it is in this film.  There is a little something to make everyone happy.
Rating: 4.5/5

 

Monday
11Jan2010

Brothers

Release Year: 2009

Director: Jim Sheridan

Review: 'Brothers' is a surprisingly restrained, thoughtful and moving examination of the effects of war on soldiers returning home to their families and the stresses that it puts on their relationships.  Capt. Sam Cahil (Toby Maguire) is believed to have been killed in combat which is devastating enough, but extra tension is applied when his degenerate brother begins to take his place in his family in his absence.  The complexity and severity of the emotional turmoil this situation causes when Sam is found to be alive, creates a fascinating look at a man desperately trying to put his life back together under overwhelmingly difficult circumstances. 

There is a lot of plot, and emotional, evolution that must take place in a short amount of time.  Considering this obstacle, the film does a fairly decent job in creating a believably complicated tangle of emotion.  Sam's brother Tommy(Jake Gyllenhaal) has a huge gap to bridge in his characters development, going from an isolated, selfish, drunk to a caring, well adjusted part of the family.  There are some pacing issues, but they are forgivable given the payoff.  The conflict between the brothers isn't what this movie is about despite what the trailer would have you believe.  It certainly plays a part in the anguish and challenges of Sam, but this is about a man suffering with his own inner demons and the family dynamic of dealing with a major conflict.  This is by far the more interesting story, and one that makes this film worth watching.  I do feel too much time was wasted with setup, but ultimately it may have been needed for a few of the later, most powerful, scenes to work.

In a film all about emotional distress, acting is key.  Fortunately 'Brothers' delivers.  The acting is superb.  The three main players, Natalie Protman, Jake Gyllenhaal and Toby Macguire, all give performances of their careers.  Macguire may outshine them all with a restrained performance, which allows the moment of emotional release pop all that much more when he unleashes his emotion.  The acting is the key component that kept this film from falling over the edge into an uncomfortable abyss of melodrama. 

'Brothers' was a surprising film in that it could have easily been an uninspired, overly dramatic, foray into jealousy, but instead is an intricately woven tapestry of emotional complexity.  Its an intense portrait of a soldier dealing with the horrors of war and a family trying to save itself.  There are absolutely gut wrenching scenes which push this into a higher caliber of film than the standard dramatic fluff, and make it well worth the watch.
Rating: 4/5

Award Consideration: The main Oscar buzz surrounding this film is the acting.  The acting is the glue that holds this film together.  Oddly enough, the one that has the best chance at actually generating a nomination is probably the lesser of the trio, in Natalie Portman.  This is not a knock on her performance.  It is great.  She is holds together a women falling apart emotionally.  A part that could have easily been over played.  She might be deserving of a nomination, but her chances of winning are slim.  I can think of at least two performances that are more deserving.

The two male leads, Gylenhaal and Maguire both give great performances.  If I were to nominate one, I'd give the slight edge to Maguire, since his performance required more restraint.  However, they are both in a tough category, and I just can't see them sneaking in past some other great actors.  They are fantastic performances, but there are just those that are better.

Finally, the film has an outside chance at nabbing a best picture nod.  With the expanded nominee list it might be the perfect movie to catch one of the new nominations.  It is mainstream which will allow the audience to relate more to the films nominated and its a good film to boot.  I wouldn't be too shocked to see it in there, but a win would be a surprise and certainly not deserved.