Search
Archive Navigation
Other Writing

Be sure to check out my blog over at FlickChart, 'The Depths of Obscurity', where I delve into the most obscure sub-genres and decide which film reigns supreme.

Entries in 1989 (9)

Sunday
Jul242011

Crimes and Misdemeanors

Release Year: 1989
Director: Woody Allen

Review: A bleak, black comedy by the master of the genre, Woody Allen, ‘Crimes and Misdemeanors’ is searing examination of morality and happiness. Following two separate story lines of two completely opposite but equally despaired individuals. One a successful doctor who’s affair is starting to catch up with him, and the other a failure of a documentarian who makes advances on a colleague amidst his failing marriage.

I’m not sure there is anything here that raises this to the pantheon of Woody Allen films, but it is solid and thought provoking nonetheless. The story line focusing on Allen’s despondent character provides the lighter moments, keeping the narrative from driving itself into a bleak oblivion. On a whole, it is more of a thinking film, weighing the implications of moral decisions and the ability to live a happy and fulfilling life despite having indiscretions. Allen, seemingly effortlessly, caresses these heavy subjects into digestible morsels, setting the table for you to examine the limits of your own moral fiber. It is film making at its finest, and the reason why Allen is so revered in his craft.

Rating: 3.5/5

 

Saturday
Jul162011

Near Death

Release Year: 1989
Director: Frederick Wiseman

Review: I’m not sure I’ve gone into a movie with as much dread as when I started watching this. It is a six-hour long documentary on terminally ill patients in the ICU. I don’t even want to watch a one-hour documentary on the ICU. Watching people die is depressing, and with the prospect of watching it for that length of time I thought it might be enough for make me wish I were dead. I went in with the mindset I was going to abhor this entire experience, but I was also determined to soldier through it.

 

As the movie started I realized I was completely right. It was just as miserable and difficult to watch as I had anticipated. Not only do we see weak, emaciated elderly people suffering as they cling to their last grasp of life, but we also get to endure the excruciating mental pain of the doctors and family members who have to go through this process with them. I wanted to shut it off, not think about it, and turn on something light and happy to cleanse myself of the despair I subjected myself to. But that’s not life. People die, and it’s hard, but it’s something that must be dealt with. Reminding myself of this, I continued on, I had to get through this.

 

Without realizing it, my attitudes suddenly started to shift. I no longer was wallowing in displeasure of the situation. I was enveloped, not becoming numb to the circumstance, but rather accepting it for what it was and becoming enamored with the people who had to care for these dying people. It’s this shift that is important in realizing what director Frederick Wiseman was trying to accomplish, and why this film is the length it is.

 

By inundating us with case after case, we begin to understand what the doctors go through. What we go through as the audience is similar to what the families of the patients go through. At first I didn’t want to watch the movie, I wanted to pretend it wasn’t happening, just as family members come into the situation. Gradually I began to accept what was happening and started listening to what the doctors were saying, and understanding that keeping people alive on machines is not really living.

 

At first I saw the doctors pushing for patients to come off life support as economic or space related, wanting to get rid of the person who had little chance of surviving even if they did start to improve. We’re shown time after time that this is not the case. The doctors care about the patients, and because they care they don’t want them to suffer to no end. As case by case goes by, I started understanding this, and getting as frustrated as the doctors when the families wouldn’t listen and continued to push for more evasive measures to be taken without seeing the bigger picture.

 

The achievement of transformation by Wiseman is nothing short of genius. He puts us right into the thick of the ICU without holding our hand or giving us any comfort. The film is shot stoically, unflinchingly, in black and white, the glow of the florescent lights and the hums and beeps of the machines creating a near intolerable climate of bleakness. We see countless patients, each with a condition as dire as the next. Each one has a family who loves them, and wants them to live just one more week. It is heartbreaking and exhausting, but its what the doctors and nurses go through everyday, and how they can take a step back from the situation and know how to handle the situation.

 

The choice to take someone off life support is essentially to kill them, at least using the strict definition of life. It’s not a choice anyone wants to make. To either end someone’s life or to keep them ‘alive’ and suffering. It’s not easy for a doctor to make that choice, but it’s easier than forcing a loved one to make it. Unfortunately they are the ones that have to make it. It is the doctor’s job to console and educate the families to make the right choice and be comfortable with their decision. It’s this skill which is most admirable, and most difficult and draining. In the end we’re lucky to only have to experience this for six hours. Doctors at the hospital in the documentary get one-month shifts. Nurses spend everyday, all year, there. I have no idea how they do it.

 

I can’t say I loved watching this documentary, and certainly never want to watch it again. But I’m in awe in how effective it was. It is a very difficult watch to say the least, but most times you have to challenge yourself to gain anything worthwhile. I can’t imagine watching this film and not being changed. I don’t know of a higher praise for a documentary than this.

Rating: 4/5

 

Thursday
Aug192010

The Unbelievable Truth

Release Year: 1989

Director: Hal Hartley

Review: Sometimes a movie can be a complete mess and yet still be totally enjoyable.  'The Unbelievable Truth' pretty much defines this category of film.  Hal Hartley's debut feature is about Audry(Adrienne Shelly), a gifted high school student who has been rendered apathetic after the realization that everything is pointless since the world is in it's final days due to the atomic bomb.  Convinced that the human race is not responsible enough to hold such a powerful weapon she spends her days waiting for the bombs to start falling in a zombie state of depression.  That is until the day the dark and mysterious Josh(Robert Burke) strolls back into town after a long stint in prison and she falls in love.  The only problem is that he was involved in the deaths of Audry's friend's sister and father.

I have no idea what to make of this film.  I can't slap any one label on it.  On one hand its a comedy, on the other hand its dark and dramatic.  It's terribly acted and the dialog sounds like its being read directly from a script, and yet it somehow all works.   When I first started watching it, I was confused.  It seemed like the quality of a bottom of the barrel straight to video piece of garbage, and yet it just draws you in.  The lines are so stiff and awkward that I had to laugh out loud, and I'm not entirely sure that this was done accidently.  The film also takes you by surprise.  I'm going along laughing at the absurdity then suddenly it switches in an instant and a line really lands, and its meaningful.  To be able to juggle these kind of elements in a film is nothing short of remarkable, and I'm not sure I've seen it done quite like this before.

 

 It had everything I love in a movie.  It has a campy 80's feel, some great lines and some material that actually makes you think. It's not by any stretch of the imagination flawless.  The plot borders on ridiculous and the characters are all entirely one sided caricatures, and yet, its great because of those flaws.  It's not taking itself to seriously, even if it pretends to be.  I'm surprised this hasn't obtained more of a cult following.  It's one of those films that is endlessly re-watchable and quotable.  One of those few films that I'd love to own so that I could pop it in when I'm down and feel better.  I'm not even going to try and explain what makes it so great, it simply works and I had a great time with it.

Rating: 4/5

Friday
Aug132010

Kiki's Delivery Service (Majo no takkyûbin)

Release Year: 1989

Director: Hayao Miyazaki

Review:  The themes in 'Kiki's Delivery Service' are much different than in most other Miyazaki films.  There are no epic tones, or overly whimsical fantasy sequences, but instead a much simpler, straight forward coming of age story.  A young witch goes out on her own to figure out her career and mature.  It's a premise that has been told many times before, but a new fresh look at it through the eyes of a teenage witch.

While its a pleasant film, it never really breaks out and goes for more than the obvious.  It felt more like a really well made saturday morning cartoon, rather than a Miyazaki feature.  There were a series of smaller adventures stitched together into a larger story and really seemed to lack conflict.  To be sure, it was a well told story with strong themes of coming of age and maturing, but it lacks the Miyzaki spirit which propels his films into a higher echelon of animation.  Its enjoyable, but not essential.
Rating: 3/5

Monday
Jan042010

Enemies: A Love Story

Release Year: 1989

Director: Paul Mazursky

Review: Talk about a love tangle.  Our hero, Herman(Ron Silver), a Jewish Holocaust survivor, has managed to get himself involved with three women at once.  Taking place in New York City shortly after the conclusion of World War II, there is an interesting dynamic of a host of Jewish survivors dealing with what they went through.  Many, like Herman, have all but given up on their faith, questioning how a God could be so cruel to them, and hence how Herman got himself into his predicament.  There is a lot to like about the themes presented here.  There are the struggles of faith, coping with tragedy as well as the factors of love and what commitment means.  The problem is that its utterly bland.  I couldn't get invested in any of Herman's struggles.  Not only did I think he was a miserable person, but he wasn't even an interesting miserable person.  I have no idea how he managed to get one person to love him, never mind three.  The entire movie felt disorganized and didn't feel like it really knew what it was trying to tell.  Its definitely more drama than anything, and yet it does play to the comedy side as well.  Only I didn't find the plight of the woman funny, I only felt pity.  There is plenty of meat to sink your teeth into with this film, only its too unfocused to really reign in what could have been a meaningful story.
Rating: 3/5

 

Monday
Apr202009

Do the Right Thing


Release Year:
1989
Review: A film full of visual style, painting a vivid, if not exaggerated, portrait of a 'typical' neighborhood in Brooklyn. Spike Lee uses vibrant colors and music and language that are full of style to create an array of interesting characters simply living their lives on a particularly hot day in the city. At the heart of this film are the racial tensions that drive the plot from beginning. This film is aptly named 'Do the Right Thing', but it is presented more as a question in the film rather than a statement. What is the right thing to do? Lee carefully constructs a brilliantly intense climatic scene in which the hatred that had been simmering all along finally erupts and the result will affect each viewer differently. Who was right and who was wrong, or if there is really a clear cut answer to that question is the essence of this film. Regardless of your opinion this film will evoke strong emotions and will make you question even your own stances on racial issues, and this is what makes this film so great.
Rating: 4/5

Friday
Dec122008

Glory

 

Release Year: 1989
Review: One of the best Civil War films made due in no small part to having one of the best ensemble casts. Morgan Freeman, Denzel Washington and Mathew Broderick all deliver in their roles. This film succeeds in showing the pride in which the black soldiers took in their duty. This was a war film not focused on the accomplishments of a few soldiers, but of an entire race.
Rating: 4/5

Thursday
Dec112008

Driving Miss Daisy

 

Release Year: 1989

Review: A very quiet film about friendship, racism and growing old. It's one of the better films about growing old, yet, I couldn't help but get a little bored. While racism is dealt with in the film, its done in a very passive way, this may have been a more engaging film if this theme had taken a slightly larger role. Regardless, Tandy and Freeman give heartfelt performances and make the film worth watching.

Rating: 3/5

Tuesday
Dec092008

When Harry Met Sally

 

Release Year: 1989
Review: A classic romantic comedy. Every time the mood becomes too sappy Billy Crystal breaks out into a brilliant comical tirade to lighten the mood. The chemistry between Crystal and and Ryan is undeniable. While I don't think it pushes the boundaries of its genre, perhaps it's because this is the film that set those boundaries.
Rating: 4/5