<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.9.2 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:04:59 GMT--><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><title>Movie Fodder</title><subtitle>Reviews</subtitle><id>http://www.moviefodder.com/reviews/</id><link rel="alternate" type="application/xhtml+xml" href="http://www.moviefodder.com/reviews/"/><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.moviefodder.com/reviews/atom.xml"/><updated>2010-03-07T15:14:58Z</updated><generator uri="http://www.squarespace.com/" version="Squarespace Site Server v5.9.2 (http://www.squarespace.com/)">Squarespace</generator><entry><title>2010 Oscar Predictions</title><id>http://www.moviefodder.com/reviews/2010-oscar-predictions.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.moviefodder.com/reviews/2010-oscar-predictions.html"/><author><name>Alex Stajos</name></author><published>2010-03-07T03:11:45Z</published><updated>2010-03-07T03:11:45Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>I tried really hard to get all the movies watched this year.&nbsp; But I fell just short.&nbsp; I do have most of the major nominations covered, with only "The Last Station" being the notable one being omitted.&nbsp; I have seen all of the major contenders and have high hopes for the awards.&nbsp; So, here are my much belated Oscar predictions.</p>
<p>Films I think deserve to win are in green, films I think will win are in red, films I think should win and will win are in red and bold.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Best Picture</strong></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Avatar<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; The Blind Side<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; District 9<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; An Education<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <span style="color: red;">The Hurt Locker</span><br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <span style="color: green;">Inglourious Basterds</span><br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Precious: Based on the Novel "Push" by Sapphire<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; A Serious Man<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Up<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Up in the Air</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>This is a huge category now that the field has been expanded to 10 nominees.&nbsp; I can't see how it makes much of a difference though, since only about 5 even have an outside chance of winning the award, and the rest just seem like fluff.&nbsp; The major contenders are 'Up in the Air', 'Avatar', 'Inglourious Basterds' and 'The Hurt Locker'.&nbsp; 'Up in the Air' was the film I would have picked to be the winner two months ago, but the buzz has died down a lot, and push for 'The Hurt Locker' has swelled.&nbsp; Kathryn Bigelow was awarded best director at the Golden Globes and the DGA awards, and is the front runner for the Oscar.&nbsp; The winner of best director signfiicantly boosts the likelyhood of winning best picture.&nbsp; 'Avatar' won the Golden Globe, and its always a contender, but in the end I don't think it has enough legs with the critics to actually get best picture.&nbsp; 'The Hurt Locker' has had great success at the awards and will likely continue that success.&nbsp; I think its a fine movie, but certainly not the best of the year.&nbsp; That would be 'Inglourious Basterds', which I think is hands down the best film of the year.&nbsp; The reason it might just walk away with a win is the way voting is done.&nbsp; Voters have to rank all the films, and the film with the highest average rank wins.&nbsp; I have to expect both 'The Hurt Locker' and 'Basterds' to be hight on most lists, giving them the most chance of winning.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Best Director</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="color: red;">Kathryn Bigelow &ndash; The Hurt Locker</span><br />James Cameron &ndash; Avatar<br />Lee Daniels &ndash; Precious: Based on the Novel "Push" by Sapphire<br />Jason Reitman &ndash; Up in the Air<br /><span style="color: green;">Quentin Tarantino &ndash; Inglourious Basterds</span></p>
<p>I generally feel the best director and best picture should go to the same film, and that is no different here.&nbsp; Quentin delivered a masterfully directed, paced, and edited film and deserves his dues.&nbsp; This is not to take away from any of the other directors nominated.&nbsp; Reitman certainly proves he is one of the best up and coming directors with two consecutive nominations.&nbsp; Next time around he just might win.&nbsp; Daniels took a small movie coming from no where and made it into one of the years best.&nbsp; Working with big stars in other mediums and unknowns he got some of the best performances of the year.&nbsp; And all Cameron did was change cinema.&nbsp; There is no doubt Cameron is a film genious, and if the award was for best overall filmmaker, the award would probably go to him.&nbsp; That leaves us with Bigelow, who will end up winning the award.&nbsp; She is certainly not undeserving, she put together a solid movie, and one that is appealing to lots of people.&nbsp; Its a slick flick with few faults, so she will pick up the metal.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Best Actor</strong></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <strong><span style="color: red;">Jeff Bridges &ndash; Crazy Heart as Bad Blake</span></strong><br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; George Clooney &ndash; Up in the Air as Ryan Bingham<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Colin Firth &ndash; A Single Man as George Falconer<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Morgan Freeman &ndash; Invictus as Nelson Mandela<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Jeremy Renner &ndash; The Hurt Locker as Sgt. William James</p>
<p>Probably the easiest pick of the night.&nbsp; The one with the clearest winner.&nbsp; Jeff Bridges gave a fantastic performance, in an otherwise mediocre movie.&nbsp; Not only was his acting fantastic, but it would also be kind of a career award, for being a great actor for so many years.&nbsp; The other nominees don't come close.&nbsp; The second place vote would go to Colin Firth, who again, gave a very good performance in an otherwise mediocre film.&nbsp; Renner is a fine actor, who did a great job with his role.&nbsp; Clooney and Freeman are kind of the obligatory nominees.&nbsp; Both gave fine performances, but nothing all that noteworthy.&nbsp; This award had better go to Bridges.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Best Actress</strong></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <span style="color: red;">Sandra Bullock &ndash; The Blind Side as Leigh Anne Tuohy</span><br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Helen Mirren &ndash; The Last Station as Sofya Tolstoy<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <span style="color: green;">Carey Mulligan &ndash; An Education as Jenny Miller</span><br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Gabourey Sidibe &ndash; Precious: Based on the Novel "Push" by Sapphire as Claireece "Precious" Jones<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Meryl Streep &ndash; Julie &amp; Julia as Julia Child</p>
<p>My "Anyone but Sandra Bullock" category.&nbsp; I bit the bullet and tried to give the film a fair watch.&nbsp; It was painful, absolutely terrible, and so was Bullock in it.&nbsp; And yet she is getting all the momentum going into the show.&nbsp; It absolutely baffles me.&nbsp; She will win, and I can't for the life of me figure out why.&nbsp; Carey Mulligan gave a terrific, multi-layed performance in 'An Education' and easily is the best of the nominees that I've seen (unfortunately I didn't get a chance to catch Mirren's performance).&nbsp; Sidibe gave a great performance, but it was very one note.&nbsp; Streep was good as usual, but it was more a caricature than anything.&nbsp; I was dissapointed Charlotte Gainsbourg didn't get nominated for Antichrist, as it was my favorite performance.&nbsp; But all the same, I'd be happy if any of the ladies, except Bullock, won.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Best Supporting Actor</strong></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Matt Damon &ndash; Invictus as Fran&ccedil;ois Pienaar<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Woody Harrelson &ndash; The Messenger as Capt. Tony Stone<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Christopher Plummer &ndash; The Last Station as Leo Tolstoy<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Stanley Tucci &ndash; The Lovely Bones as George Harvey<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <strong><span style="color: red;">Christoph Waltz &ndash; Inglourious Basterds as Col. Hans Landa</span></strong></p>
<p>Unfortunately a category that has two performances I haven't seen (Plummer and Tucci).&nbsp; Fortunately, I think this category is locked up.&nbsp; Waltz gave us one of the best villains ever, and a performance to match.&nbsp; He should be the hands down winner.&nbsp; I like Damon, but why he was nominated for Invictus is beyond me.&nbsp; Harrelson was very good in The Messenger, but doesn't come close to Waltz.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Best Supporting Actress</strong></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Pen&eacute;lope Cruz &ndash; Nine as Carla Albanese<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Vera Farmiga &ndash; Up in the Air as Alex Goran<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Maggie Gyllenhaal &ndash; Crazy Heart as Jean Craddock<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Anna Kendrick &ndash; Up in the Air as Natalie Keener<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <strong><span style="color: red;">Mo'Nique &ndash; Precious: Based on the Novel "Push" by Sapphire as Mary Lee Johnston</span></strong></p>
<p>Once again, I missed out on a performance, this time Penelope Cruz (who, I thought was great in Broken Embraces, and might have went with if she were nominated in that role).&nbsp; I wasn't blown away by either performances in 'Up in the Air', both were fine, just not great.&nbsp; Gyllenhaal was also fine in Crazy Heart, but not a performance she hasn't given a few times before.&nbsp; Mo'Nique is the clear stand out, giving a chilling performance in 'Precious' and should be the easy winner.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Best Animated Feature</strong></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Coraline &ndash; Henry Selick<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <span style="color: green;">Fantastic Mr. Fox &ndash; Wes Anderson</span><br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; The Princess and the Frog &ndash; Ron Clements and John Musker<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; The Secret of Kells &ndash; Tomm Moore<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <span style="color: red;">Up &ndash; Pete Docter</span></p>
<p>After seeing 'Up' I thought it was a lock for best animated feature.&nbsp; And it probably is.&nbsp; But I was blown away by "Fantastic Mr. Fox', which was so original, and entertaining, it won over my vote.&nbsp; 'Coraline' was just weird, and kind of missed the mark on me.&nbsp; I enjoyed 'The Princess and the Frog', it felt like a return to the classic Disney, and I miss those.&nbsp; 'The Secret of Kells' also didn't do much for me and didn't think it was quite the calibour to be nominated.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Best Foreign Language Film</strong></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Ajami (Israel) in Arabic and Hebrew &ndash; Scandar Copti and Yaron Shani<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; El Secreto de Sus Ojos (Argentina) in Spanish &ndash; Juan Jos&eacute; Campanella<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; The Milk of Sorrow (Peru) in Spanish and Quechua &ndash; Claudia Llosa<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <strong><span style="color: red;">Un Proph&egrave;te (France) in French, Corsican and Arabic &ndash; Jacques Audiard</span></strong><br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; The White Ribbon (Germany) in German &ndash; Michael Haneke</p>
<p>This is one of the categories that I'm not all that prepared to pick a winner in.&nbsp; I have seen the two heavy favorites, 'Un Prophete', and 'The White Ribbon'.&nbsp; While, beautiful, I didn't enjoy 'The White Ribbon'.&nbsp; I had a bad viewing experience with 'Un Prophete' where I watched it over a couple days, and the subtitles were off, and I came away not enjoying it all that much, but probably not fairly.&nbsp; In the end I will give it to 'Un Prophet', but hope to watch at least one more in the category before the show.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Best Documentary Feature</strong></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Burma VJ &ndash; Anders &Oslash;stergaard and Lise Lense-M&oslash;ller<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <strong><span style="color: red;">The Cove &ndash; Louie Psihoyos and Fisher Stevens</span></strong><br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Food, Inc. &ndash; Robert Kenner and Elise Pearlstein<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; The Most Dangerous Man in America: Daniel Ellsberg and the Pentagon Papers &ndash; Judith Ehrlich and Rick Goldsmith<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Which Way Home &ndash; Rebecca Cammisa</p>
<p>Of the three that I saw, 'Burma VJ', 'The Cove' and 'Food Inc.', it seems like its a strong field this year.  I'm really split between 'Burma VJ' and 'The Cove'.  Both effected me strongly.  One opened by eyes to the cruelty in Bruma and the other to the cruelty to Dolphins.  In the end I'm giving it to 'The Cove' simply because its a more effective presentation.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Best Live Action Short</strong></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; The Door &ndash; Juanita Wilson and James Flynn<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <strong><span style="color: red;">Instead of Abracadabra &ndash; Patrik Eklund and Mathias Fjellstr&ouml;m</span></strong><br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Kavi &ndash; Gregg Helvey<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Miracle Fish &ndash; Luke Doolan and Drew Bailey<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; The New Tenants &ndash; Joachim Back and Tivi Magnusson</p>
<p>One of my favorite categories at the awards is the shorts.&nbsp; I try to watch all the shorts, so that I'm invested in them.&nbsp; Watching these filmmakers win is special, since they are virtually unknown to everyone.&nbsp; Of the five films, I enjoyed three quite a bit.&nbsp; 'The Door' and 'Miracle Fish' completely missed the mark for me. 'The Door' is just sad, and not really all that interesting.&nbsp; 'Miracle Fish' is disturbing but I'm not really sure the point of it.&nbsp; 'Kavi' is moving short, but falls a bit flat at the end.&nbsp; 'The New Tenants' is halarious, and completely over the top, but a good time.&nbsp; 'Instead of Abracadabra' is my clear winner though.&nbsp; It is one of the funniest movies of the year, and got more laughs out of me in the 20 minutes than any other full length film.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Best Animated Short</strong></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; French Roast &ndash; Fabrice O. Joubert<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Granny O'Grimm's Sleeping Beauty &ndash; Nicky Phelan and Darragh O&rsquo;Connell<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; The Lady and the Reaper &ndash; Javier Recio Gracia<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Logorama &ndash; Nicolas Schmerkin<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <strong><span style="color: red;">A Matter of Loaf and Death &ndash; Nick Park</span></strong></p>
<p>I was a bit dissapointed in this years crop of animated shorts.&nbsp; 'French Roast' was enjoyable and would take second place for me, but the clear winner is Wallace and Grommit's "A Matter of Load and Death".&nbsp; They are still kings of the animated short.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Best Orginal Screenplay</strong></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; The Hurt Locker &ndash; Mark Boal<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <strong><span><span style="color: red;">Inglourious Basterds &ndash; Quentin Tarantino</span></span></strong><br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; The Messenger &ndash; Alessandro Camon and Oren Moverman<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; A Serious Man &ndash; Joel Coen and Ethan Coen<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Up &ndash; Tom McCarthy, Bob Peterson and Pete Docter</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Best Adapted Screenplay</strong></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; District 9 &ndash; Neill Blomkamp and Terri Tatchell from Alive in Joburg by Blomkamp<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; An Education &ndash; Nick Hornby from An Education by Lynn Barber<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; In the Loop &ndash; Jesse Armstrong, Simon Blackwell, Armando Iannucci and Tony Roche from The Thick of It created by Iannucci<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Precious: Based on the Novel "Push" by Sapphire &ndash; Geoffrey Fletcher from Push by Sapphire<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <strong><span style="color: red;">Up in the Air &ndash; Jason Reitman and Sheldon Turner from Up in the Air by Walter Kirn</span></strong></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Best Documentary Short</strong></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <strong><span style="color: red;">China&rsquo;s Unnatural Disaster: The Tears of Sichuan Province &ndash; Jon Alpert and Matthew O'Neill</span></strong><br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; The Last Campaign of Governor Booth Gardner &ndash; Daniel Junge and Henry Ansbacher<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; The Last Truck: Closing of a GM Plant &ndash; Steven Bognar and Julia Reichert<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Music by Prudence &ndash; Roger Ross Williams and Elinor Burkett<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Rabbit &agrave; la Berlin &ndash; Bartosz Konopka and Anna Wydra</p>
<p><br /><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Best Original Score</strong></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Avatar &ndash; James Horner<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <strong><span style="color: red;">Fantastic Mr. Fox &ndash; Alexandre Desplat</span></strong><br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; The Hurt Locker &ndash; Marco Beltrami and Buck Sanders<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Sherlock Holmes &ndash; Hans Zimmer<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Up &ndash; Michael Giacchino</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Best Original Song</strong></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; "Almost There" from The Princess and the Frog &ndash; Randy Newman<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; "Down in New Orleans" from The Princess and the Frog &ndash; Randy Newman<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; "Loin de Paname" from Paris 36 &ndash; Reinhardt Wagner and Frank Thomas<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; "Take it All" from Nine &ndash; Maury Yeston<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <strong><span style="color: red;">"The Weary Kind (Theme from Crazy Heart)" from Crazy Heart &ndash; Ryan Bingham and T-Bone Burnett</span></strong></p>
<p><br /><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Best Sound Editing</strong></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Avatar &ndash; Christopher Boyes and Gwendolyn Yates Whittle<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <strong><span style="color: red;">The Hurt Locker &ndash; Paul N.J. Ottosson</span></strong><br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Inglourious Basterds &ndash; Wylie Stateman<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Star Trek &ndash; Mark Stoeckinger and Alan Rankin<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Up &ndash; Michael Silvers and Tom Myers</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Best Sound Mixing</strong></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Avatar &ndash; Christopher Boyes, Gary Summers, Andy Nelson and Tony Johnson<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <strong><span style="color: red;">The Hurt Locker &ndash; Paul N.J. Ottosson and Ray Beckett</span></strong><br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Inglourious Basterds &ndash; Michael Minkler, Tony Lamberti and Mark Ulano<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Star Trek &ndash; Anna Behlmer, Andy Nelson and Peter J. Devlin<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen &ndash; Greg P. Russell, Gary Summers and Geoffrey Patterson</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Best Art Direction</strong></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <strong><span style="color: red;">Avatar &ndash; Art Direction: Rick Carter and Robert Stromberg; Set Decoration: Kim Sinclair</span></strong><br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; The Imaginarium of Dr. Parnassus &ndash; Art Direction: Dave Warren and Anastasia Masaro; Set Decoration: Caroline Smith<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Nine &ndash; Art Direction: John Myhre; Set Decoration: Gordon Sim<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Sherlock Holmes &ndash; Art Direction: Sarah Greenwood; Set Decoration: Katie Spencer<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; The Young Victoria &ndash; Art Direction: Patrice Vermette; Set Decoration: Maggie Gray</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Best Cinematography</strong></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <span style="color: red;">Avatar &ndash; Mauro Fiore</span><br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <span style="color: green;">Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince &ndash; Bruno Delbonnel</span><br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; The Hurt Locker &ndash; Barry Ackroyd<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Inglourious Basterds &ndash; Robert Richardson<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; The White Ribbon &ndash; Christian Berger</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Best Makeup</strong></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Il Divo &ndash; Aldo Signoretti and Vittorio Sodano<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <span style="color: green;">Star Trek &ndash; Barney Burman, Mindy Hall and Joel Harlow</span><br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <span style="color: red;">The Young Victoria &ndash; Jon Henry Gordon and Jenny Shircore</span></p>
<p><br /><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Best Costume Design</strong></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Bright Star &ndash; Janet Patterson<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Coco Before Chanel &ndash; Catherine Leterrier<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; The Imaginarium of Dr. Parnassus &ndash; Monique Prudhomme<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Nine &ndash; Colleen Atwood<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <strong><span style="color: red;">The Young Victoria &ndash; Sandy Powell</span></strong></p>
<p><br /><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Best Film Editing</strong></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <span style="color: red;">Avatar &ndash; James Cameron, John Refoua and Stephen E. Rivkin</span><br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; District 9 &ndash; Julian Clarke<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; The Hurt Locker &ndash; Chris Innis and Bob Murawski<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <span style="color: green;">Inglourious Basterds &ndash; Sally Menke</span><br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Precious: Based on the Novel "Push" by Sapphire &ndash; Joe Klotz</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Best Visual Effects</strong></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <span style="color: red;">Avatar &ndash; Joe Letteri, Stephen Rosenbaum, Richard Baneham and Andrew R. Jones</span><br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; District 9 &ndash; Dan Kaufman, Peter Muyzers, Robert Habros, and Matt Aitken<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Star Trek &ndash; Roger Guyett, Russell Earl, Paul Kavanagh and Burt Dalton</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>A Perfect Getaway</title><category term="2009"/><category term="Action &amp; Adventure"/><category term="Suspense"/><id>http://www.moviefodder.com/reviews/a-perfect-getaway.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.moviefodder.com/reviews/a-perfect-getaway.html"/><author><name>Alex Stajos</name></author><published>2010-02-23T17:00:01Z</published><updated>2010-02-23T17:00:01Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<div class="body">
<div class="body">
<p style="text-align: center;"><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.moviefodder.com/storage/a-perfect-getaway.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1264220906487" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">Release Year: </span>2009</p>
<p><strong>Director: </strong>David Twohy</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">Review: </span>An odd, twisted, adventure of a couple trying to escape another, murderous, couple on their honeymoon in Hawaii. &nbsp;There is a lot wrong with this movie. &nbsp;The main character is a screenwriter and its obvious the screenwriter had a good time talking about the process in the movie and at the same time trying to out clever the audience. &nbsp;It's a complete mess. &nbsp;There are plot holes a mile wide, twists that you can see coming and corny plot points which make it apparent exactly the caliber of film you are dealing with. &nbsp;And yet, despite all of this, I couldn't help but have fun with it. &nbsp;Yes, its flawed in every imaginable way, but I still had a good time on the ride. &nbsp;I found myself enjoying the pace, trying to keep up with the writer, and anticipating his next twist. &nbsp;I enjoyed the ridiculous situations and the stereotyped characters, it was oddly comforting. &nbsp; Upon the conclusion of the movie I declared it was 'terrible', and it was, but I still got some guilty enjoyment out of it. &nbsp;There is nothing new here, and its certainly not high class cinema, but its not the worst thing you could watch on a plane ride.<br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Rating: </span>3/5</p>
</div>
</div>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Adam</title><category term="2009"/><category term="Drama"/><category term="Indie"/><category term="Romance"/><id>http://www.moviefodder.com/reviews/adam.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.moviefodder.com/reviews/adam.html"/><author><name>Alex Stajos</name></author><published>2010-02-21T17:00:00Z</published><updated>2010-02-21T17:00:00Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<div class="body">
<div class="body">
<p style="text-align: center;"><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.moviefodder.com/storage/Adam-movie-f04.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1264220665000" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">Release Year: </span>2009</p>
<p><strong>Director: </strong>Max Mayer</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">Review: </span>The premise had be intrigued, a man with Asperger syndrome gets involved with a normal woman, and they struggle as a couple. &nbsp;The problem is movie fails to set up a believable relationship. &nbsp;On the one hand you have Beth (Rose Byrne) an impossibly attractive, charismatic and seemingly flawless women and Adam (Hugh Dancy), a shuttered, introverted, emotionally closed and at times angry man with Aspergers. &nbsp;Through random chance they meet and become a couple, and yet it is never shown what is appealing in Adam to Beth. &nbsp;There is zero believability in the relationship, something the entire film is pivoted on. &nbsp;There are some touching moments, and it does bring up good questions on the extents of love, and what we are willing to overcome in a relationship, but on a whole it fails. &nbsp;Its overly convenient and never captures the essence of the relationship, a misstep which cannot be overlooked.<br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Rating: </span>3/5</p>
</div>
</div>
<p>﻿</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Dogma</title><category term="1999"/><category term="Comedy"/><category term="Religion"/><id>http://www.moviefodder.com/reviews/dogma.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.moviefodder.com/reviews/dogma.html"/><author><name>Alex Stajos</name></author><published>2010-02-19T17:00:01Z</published><updated>2010-02-19T17:00:01Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<div class="body">
<div class="body">
<p style="text-align: center;"><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.moviefodder.com/storage/dogma.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1264219831692" alt="" /></span></span>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">Release Year: </span>1999</p>
<p><strong>Director: </strong>Kevin Smith</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">Review: </span>This is not a film that can be taken too seriously. &nbsp;Perhaps Smith stepped in over his head delving into religious territory, but at it's core its an enjoyable, funny and extremely off color take on a religious story. &nbsp;Most of the content is absolutely absurd, and put in context with the subject matter it feels a little out of place. &nbsp;And yet, taken strictly as a comedy, it works out in the end. &nbsp;There are definitely a lot of moments that are groan worthy, but in the end the laughs far out weigh the eye rolls, making this a fine addition to Smith's catalog, but far from his best.<br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Rating: </span>3/5</p>
</div>
</div>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Man Push Cart</title><category term="2005"/><category term="Drama"/><category term="Indie"/><id>http://www.moviefodder.com/reviews/man-push-cart.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.moviefodder.com/reviews/man-push-cart.html"/><author><name>Alex Stajos</name></author><published>2010-02-17T17:00:01Z</published><updated>2010-02-17T17:00:01Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<div class="body">
<div class="body">
<p style="text-align: center;"><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 350px;" src="http://www.moviefodder.com/storage/man-push-cart-3.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1264219349059" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">Release Year: </span>2005</p>
<p><strong>Director: </strong>Ramin Bahrani</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">Review: </span>There is such a thing as too minimalist, and unfortunately 'Man Push Cart' falls into &nbsp;this category. &nbsp;What kind of person works in these tiny carts where I get my morning bagel? &nbsp;On the surface its an interesting premise, about a former pop star in Pakistan who has fallen on tough times in New York City as a push cart vendor. &nbsp;The movie just doesn't do much. &nbsp;Every time it starts to go somewhere interesting, it reins itself in and just sits there, defunct of any life. &nbsp;There seemed to be a perfectly good story just out of reach and I felt cheated that director Ramin Bahrani withheld it.<br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Rating: </span>2/5</p>
</div>
</div>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Miller's Crossing</title><category term="1990"/><category term="Crime"/><category term="Drama"/><id>http://www.moviefodder.com/reviews/millers-crossing.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.moviefodder.com/reviews/millers-crossing.html"/><author><name>Alex Stajos</name></author><published>2010-02-15T17:00:54Z</published><updated>2010-02-15T17:00:54Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<div class="body">
<div class="body">
<p style="text-align: center;"><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.moviefodder.com/storage/millercorssing4.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1264219046853" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">Release Year: </span>1990</p>
<p><strong>Director: </strong>Joel Coen</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">Review: </span>Coen Brother films often take several viewings to fully appreciate, and I think this may be the case for 'Miller's Crossing'. &nbsp;I spent the majority of the first half of the film finding myself completely lost and trying to figure out what exactly I was watching. &nbsp;There are a lot of players involved in this crime drama, and it took some effort to keep them straight. &nbsp;I did catch up and became engrossed by the end, but feel it deserves another viewing to fully capture the effect. &nbsp;What I did take away was absolutely stunning film with some incredibly powerful, on the edge of your seat, scenes. &nbsp;I enjoyed the film a great deal, but I think I could love it on repeat viewings.<br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Rating: </span>3.5/5</p>
</div>
</div>
<p>﻿</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>It's a Wonderful Life</title><category term="1946"/><category term="Classics"/><category term="Drama"/><category term="Holiday"/><id>http://www.moviefodder.com/reviews/its-a-wonderful-life.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.moviefodder.com/reviews/its-a-wonderful-life.html"/><author><name>Alex Stajos</name></author><published>2010-02-13T17:00:09Z</published><updated>2010-02-13T17:00:09Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<div class="body">
<div class="body">
<p style="text-align: center;"><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.moviefodder.com/storage/itsawonderfullife.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1264218773308" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>"What is it you want, Mary? What do you want? You want the moon? Just say the word and I'll throw a lasso around it and pull it down."</strong></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">Release Year: </span>1946</p>
<p><strong>Director: </strong>Frank Capra</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">Review: </span>There are those movies which are synonymous with Christmas, and 'It's a Wonderful Life' is chief among them. &nbsp;Wrapping up the essential spirit of Christmas, the spirit of community, into a well packaged moving film, it is no wonder why this is a favorite to so many around the holidays. &nbsp;It never quite felt like a Christmas movie to me, perhaps because the sentiment felt a little to convenient. &nbsp;I did have problems with some of the assumptions the movie makes, but this is just nit picking. &nbsp;I could watch Jimmy Stewart in anything, and this is perhaps his best, most fitting, role. &nbsp;It may be a bit sappy, but it is undeniably heartfelt.<br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Rating: </span>4/5</p>
</div>
</div>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Ikiru</title><category term="1952"/><category term="Classics"/><category term="Drama"/><category term="Foreign"/><category term="Japanese"/><id>http://www.moviefodder.com/reviews/ikiru.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.moviefodder.com/reviews/ikiru.html"/><author><name>Alex Stajos</name></author><published>2010-02-11T17:01:04Z</published><updated>2010-02-11T17:01:04Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<div class="body">
<p style="text-align: center;"><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.moviefodder.com/storage/ikiru.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1261893497655" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">Release Year: </span>1952</p>
<p><strong>Director: </strong>Akira Kurosawa</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">Review: </span>Akira Kurosawa makes what could be one of the bleakest, dullest plots into a film that an absolutely captivating and moving experience. &nbsp;An aging bureaucrat finds out that he has cancer. In an attempt to salvage some meaning to his life before he goes out he makes building a children's playground his mission. &nbsp;It's not one of the most riveting premises. &nbsp;Let us not forget however, that Kurosawa is a genius. &nbsp;The way that he handles this off-putting material is sincere, and touching. The acting by Takashi Shimura elevates the role above just pitiful dying man. &nbsp;It is a brilliant existential examination, and biting criticism of how we waste our lives. &nbsp;It has some of the most gut wrenchingly sad scenes, but the overall payoff is uplifting. &nbsp;Kurosawa once again blew me away with his use of camera and framing to make what could be a mundane, flat scene, completely compelling and hard hitting. &nbsp;This is the best 'cancer' film I've seen, and proof positive that Kurosawa is a master.<br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Rating: </span>4.5/5</p>
</div>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Before Sunrise</title><category term="1995"/><category term="Indie"/><category term="Romance"/><id>http://www.moviefodder.com/reviews/before-sunrise.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.moviefodder.com/reviews/before-sunrise.html"/><author><name>Alex Stajos</name></author><published>2010-02-09T17:00:45Z</published><updated>2010-02-09T17:00:45Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<div class="body">
<p style="text-align: center;"><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 350px;" src="http://www.moviefodder.com/storage/before-sunrise.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1261893053164" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">Release Year: </span>1995</p>
<p><strong>Director: </strong>Richard Linklater</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">Review: </span>Romance isn't something that is new to film. &nbsp;It seems like every movie has some sort of romantic angle wedged in. &nbsp;And yet, I don't know if the spirit of the first romantic connection, the spark of love, is captured quite so well as it is in 'Before Sunrise'. &nbsp; Two strangers meet, and they have a single night to make a meaningful connection. &nbsp;It is so simple, so eloquent, and so real. &nbsp;I'm drawn in with dialog, and thats all this movie is. &nbsp;It's as if we get to peek into this couples unforgettable night, and see every moment which makes these two people fall in love. &nbsp;The first awkward moments, the little moments that define the foundation of a relationship are laid out so effortlessly and naturally that it entangles you in their relationship. &nbsp;The purity and honesty captured by Linklater make this film work. &nbsp;There isn't much here, its the simplicity, the wit and the charm that make this a wonderful movie.&nbsp; <br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Rating: </span>4.5/5</p>
</div>
<p>﻿</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Dr. Strangelove</title><category term="1964"/><category term="Classics"/><category term="Comedy"/><category term="Political"/><id>http://www.moviefodder.com/reviews/dr-strangelove.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.moviefodder.com/reviews/dr-strangelove.html"/><author><name>Alex Stajos</name></author><published>2010-02-07T17:00:04Z</published><updated>2010-02-07T17:00:04Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<div class="body">
<p style="text-align: center;"><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.moviefodder.com/storage/DrStrangelove4.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1261892879544" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">Release Year: </span>1964</p>
<p><strong>Director: </strong>Stanley Kubrick</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">Review: </span>Simply one of the best satires ever made. &nbsp;There is not a single wasted scene, and everything hits squarely where it is supposed to. &nbsp;It's both unsettling, and hilarious, the perfect mix for a political satire. &nbsp;Kubrick is an incredible director, and letting him lead you down this twisted path toward world annihilation is fascinating. &nbsp;Peter Sellers is the best he has ever been, making his characters not seem to over the top, but all fascinating and indistinguishable from one another. &nbsp;'Dr. Stranglove' is endlessly quotable and watchable. &nbsp;It goes beyond great and into iconic. &nbsp;I think the 'biting satire' mold was cast from this Kubrick masterpiece.<br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Rating: </span>5/5</p>
</div>
<p>﻿</p>]]></content></entry></feed>